Skip to main content
Get Started
Get Started
Open the mobile menu:
Pricing and Partnership Options

Choose the Funding Model That Fits Your Institution

We offer five distinct pricing models because universities don’t all operate the same way. Your budget level and cycle, internal capacity and risk tolerance determine which model makes sense.

Some institutions need speed and can’t wait for budget approval cycles. Others have available funds but limited staff. We’ve structured our partnership options to match these real situations and more, without pushing you into a one-size-fits-all arrangement.

Schedule a Conversation Download Our Brochure

Five Flexible Ways to Partner With AllCampus

We offer different funding models that match different institutional situations. Your choice depends on unique factors such as budget availability, internal capacity, risk tolerance and speed to market.

Model Best Fit For
Revenue Share Schools needing speed, scale and investment support
Co-Investment Institutions that want an agency-like relationship and have some funds to support marketing
Hybrid Fee-for-Service Partners who want a vendor that’s incentivized for growth but also want full control of the marketing budget
Bridge Fee-for-Service Universities that want to take capabilities in-house, but need a bridge to get there
Fee-for-Service Institutions with funds and internal oversight looking for scoped, direct support

Each model balances risk, investment and control differently. The right fit depends on your budget cycle, internal capacity and strategic priorities. A short conversation with our team can help you assess which approach aligns with your institutional reality.

Schedule a time to talk about the best approach

Over 90%

Partner renewal rate (2025)

With an average partnership lasting over 5 years, our partners choose to stay because we deliver performance, service and scale at a cost they can't achieve on their own.

How We Help You Choose the Right Pricing Model

All Clear: We show you the economics.

Before moving forward, we walk through the financial model together. You see projected early marketing investment, cost-to-serve assumptions and expected performance benchmarks so leadership teams understand how the model is designed to perform.

All Aligned: We recommend what fits your institution’s unique needs.

Every university operates with different budgets, internal capabilities and risk tolerance. Our goal is to understand your institutional priorities and the way your teams work best. Then, we recommend the model that fits, whether that is revenue share, fee-for-service or a hybrid format.

All Results: We align incentives for performance.

With each pricing option, the accountability framework changes, but our commitment to results stays the same. In revenue share models, we share enrollment risk. In fee-for-service agreements, we commit to defined scope and timelines.

Expert Perspective

Get expert insights right now: Our EVP of University Solutions breaks down revenue sharing vs. fee-for-service.

Which Model Fits Your Institution?

AllCampus offers a range of partnership models. These run from full revenue share, where we invest in marketing and recruitment and are compensated through enrollment, to fee-for-service agreements with a defined scope and timeline.

We also have hybrid and co-investment models that allow our partners to find the model that best fits with their own results-driven profile.

The right choice depends on factors unique to your institution. A short conversation with our team can provide clear direction on which approach fits.

Budget, Goals & Internal Capacity

Timeline & Market Urgency

Risk Tolerance & Strategic Priorities

Schedule a Conversation